Powered by Textbook Widget

Search here for medical pg entrance books you want to buy

Friday, May 10, 2013

What is the possibility of NEET verdict in vacation?

-->
What is the possibility of NEET results in vacation?

First thing link to last year supreme court holidays 2012 CLICK HERE .From this data it is clear holidays was from may 13 to July 1

Now link to site of judgement click here
BELOW WE GIVE SCREEN SHOT OF SITE IN THAT SELECT DATE OF JUDGEMENT AS BETWEEN MAY 13 TO JULY 1

THERE WAS TOTAL OF 17 CASES THAT WAS GIVEN JUDGEMENT DURING LAST YEAR VACATION.
ONE THING WE NOTICED IS ALL ARE APPEAL CRIMINAL OR CIVIL..NO OTHER CASES SEEN AMONG CASES WHERE JUDGEMENT  GIVEN DURING LAST YEAR VACATION
5 WHERE CIVIL CASES
1st CASE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1739 OF 2007 
2nd CASE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.840 of 2012.
There was hearing for this case on 14th may.so it could have been in vacation list
3rd CASE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 651 OF 2009
4th CASE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1887 OF 2008
5 th CASE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.870 of 2007
6th CASE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1340 of 2007
7th CASE CIVIL APPEAL No. 3185 OF 2005
8 TH CASE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.878 of 2010
9TH CASE CIVIL APPEAL No. 1723 OF 2008
10TH CASE CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 6224 OF 2008
11TH CASE CRIMINAL APPEAL NOs.2066-67 OF 2009
12th case CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 870 OF 2012
13 th case CIVIL APPEAL No. 4986-4989 OF 2007
14 th case CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3984 OF 2012 
15th case CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 82 OF 2008
16 th case CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 97 OF 2012
17 th case REVIEW PETITION (CRL.) NO. 85 OF 2012 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 68 OF 2012
YOU CAN ALSO CHECK CASE STATUS FOR THESE CASES CLICK HERE

THE IMPORTANT THING WE NOTICED IS ALL CASES ARE APPEALS.AND VERY FEW CIVIL CASE.OF CIVIL CASES MOST ARE SERVICE MATTERS .SO  THERE IS POSSIBILITY FOR THESE CASES WAS CASES INCLUDED IN VACATION LIST.WE SEARCHED FOR VACATION LIST.BUT THAT DATA WE CAN'T FIND OUT IN WEBSITE .STILL BY SITE FOR CASE STATUS IT IS CLEAR MANY CASES WHERE INCLUDED IN VACATION BENCH..
NEET CASE TC(C)98/2012 IS CIVIL CASE.ADMISSION MATTERS NOT INCLUDED IN VACATION LIST.
BUT STILL WE EXPECT VERDICT CAN BE ANNOUNCED..MORE OVER USUALLY VERDICT SHOULD BE GIVEN BY 15 DAYS AFTER HEARING..EVEN IF IT CAN BE EXTENDED TILL MONTHS NEVER MORE THAN 2 MONTHS EXCEPT IN VERY RARE CONDITIONS..SO HEARING ON NEET CASE OVER BY APRIL 30 ..WE DON'T EXPECT CASE WILL BE DELAYED TILL JULY 2 ND..IT WILL BE MORE THAN 2 MONTHS BY THAT TIME.
SO WE DON'T EXPECT SUCH INFORMATION PROVIDED BY SITES AND NEWS CHANNELS IS TRUE..WE WILL UPDATE YOU INFORMATION IF ANY CONFIRMED INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON NEET CASE..HOPE THIS INFORMATION USEFUL..


-->

8 comments:

  1. Your updates give us some hope...

    ReplyDelete
  2. After all the havoc created today..this post seems to revive some hope...a little faith in indian judiciary..thank you for being positive in the current pessimistic situation!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for the update. I looked up the SC website, and found this link which is a pdf file containing advance list of cases to be discussed by Vacation bench.
    www.supremecourtofindia.nic.in/outtoday/vacation.pdf

    It is an exhaustive list, but I couldn't find NEET case listed in it.
    Also, the vacation bench does not consist of either CJI or the other 2 Judges studying our case. So can a verdict whether final or interim, be given in their absence in such an important case.
    Also, worth noting that other imp cases like Coalgate scam have also been pushed to July as well.
    So do you think a verdict will still be given in vacations.
    Pls reply, as I am fed up of checking everyday, if it is July, then be it. There's little we can do, but at least we can concentrate on our studies, job rather than refreshing all these sites.
    Thanks again.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanx for sharing this.was a relief to know there is still some hope.

    ReplyDelete
  5. No you got it absolutely wrong. SC or HC does not have any binding towards delivering verdict for reserved judgements. There are many cases in which verdicts were kept on reserved for more than a year. One thing for sure is that CJ is retiring on 18th JULY hence that is the max. time limit for verdict. To deliver verdict all three judges have to be present at the time of verdict announcement which is a very distant possibility in summer vacation. Most important thing is that this verdict has to be a genuine one and should be sustainable on very strict scrutiny hence it is obvious that SC judges require to give some serious and lot of time to derive a conclusion which does not seems an easy job after considering the length of arguments, truck load of citations and cosidering constitutional provisions. Here people are losing their patience but how many of them can read 5000 of fullscape pages on the go and derive the conclusion. You people require a duration of a year to read these many pages and despite that some of you fails.
    So I request administrator of this site to not provide wrong information obtained from hearsay basis and give the people a false hope.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Wht a beautiful gud mrng... of hope. Thanks for updating. It has given some hope atleast.

    ReplyDelete
  7. yes ,u people giving us wrong informations.once cji said it wll be on 2nd july.only one person can change this is president......n from that side we have hope as who wll request him.....i think MCI SHOULD NONE OTHER......THNKS

    ReplyDelete